nixstor
03-11 12:36 PM
If you are from the state of Vermont and would like to participate in the FOIA campaign, please contact me immediately via PM.
Thanks
Thanks
wallpaper hard cover for blackberry
waitforgc1
04-01 05:29 PM
Could please update your profile.
And regarding problems at POE... its not totally true but at the same time you cannot
rule out totally also.
so basically keep all the required documents like your employer letter... and
if possible your client letter showing you have job when you come back and
also your recent paystubs.
And regarding problems at POE... its not totally true but at the same time you cannot
rule out totally also.
so basically keep all the required documents like your employer letter... and
if possible your client letter showing you have job when you come back and
also your recent paystubs.
beautifulMind
02-05 06:43 PM
i485 rfe for my wife. Please help
My wife received an rfe for the things listed below. I think she got it because her finger prints are not machine readable and FBI have not been able to verify it....
1) Submit true certfied copies of any and all arresting officers reports....blah blah blah
2) Other: Local police clearance Letter from every place you have lived in united states
My wife has been in US close to five years and lived in 2 cities
MY question is
for 1) she has never violated any law so does not have court disposition or anything of that sort so does she need
anything for this?
for 2) She has resided in 2 cities but also stayed in India for 4 months.
The rfe clearly says "for every place lived in united states"
so I would think she does not need a police clearance certificate
from India
Please help we have till march 5th to reply this RFE
My wife received an rfe for the things listed below. I think she got it because her finger prints are not machine readable and FBI have not been able to verify it....
1) Submit true certfied copies of any and all arresting officers reports....blah blah blah
2) Other: Local police clearance Letter from every place you have lived in united states
My wife has been in US close to five years and lived in 2 cities
MY question is
for 1) she has never violated any law so does not have court disposition or anything of that sort so does she need
anything for this?
for 2) She has resided in 2 cities but also stayed in India for 4 months.
The rfe clearly says "for every place lived in united states"
so I would think she does not need a police clearance certificate
from India
Please help we have till march 5th to reply this RFE
2011 for your lackberry and i
ilikekilo
04-12 01:53 PM
I had started my anual subscribtion this Friday (4/10/09). How long does it take to be admitted into the donors forum? I have sent the email with details that same day itself. I have not yet recieved a reciept or any RFEs. Hope there is no backlog:D:D:D
I think it takes a few days to confirm the sub....thnks
I think it takes a few days to confirm the sub....thnks
more...
brahmam
10-10 11:06 AM
Nothing special.
1. your appointment notice
2. Driver's license.
We also took the 485 receipt notice and the passport, just in case.
Good luck.
1. your appointment notice
2. Driver's license.
We also took the 485 receipt notice and the passport, just in case.
Good luck.
kufloyd
04-03 08:35 PM
My sister, as part of submitting documents for her fiance visa application, recently got a birth certificate. However, it doesn't have her name on it. Odd as it sounds, the municipality says that this is common practice. It just has the name of the parents.
Is this acceptable for a fiance visa? Thanks.
Is this acceptable for a fiance visa? Thanks.
more...
Macaca
09-27 11:40 AM
Following Bush Over a Cliff (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/26/AR2007092602067.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com) | Washington Post, September 27, 2007
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
2010 For Blackberry 9700 Zebra
marsardpt
07-17 05:13 PM
Hello, my wife and I have been approved and got notice of action (I-797C) in mail May 23 (recieved date May 22). Online USCIS states our cards went into production June 13th and allow 30 days to recieve. We have not moved but will in mid August in order to begin work under OPT. We called USCIS service center on 1-800-375-5283 on 30th day and put in a trace on our cards. USCIS states case will be assigned within 30 days and then expect within 45 days to hear. This is impossible as we hope to begin work before that. I know that calls can be made to get permission to work as we are F-1 graduating Aug 8th BUT need the cards for our bank to approve financing.
Question - is there any way to make direct contact with someone who can tell us the card WAS mailed and provide confirmation. It is odd that regulkar mail delivers such a valuable, time consuming document.
Any comments would be helpful.
Marsar
Question - is there any way to make direct contact with someone who can tell us the card WAS mailed and provide confirmation. It is odd that regulkar mail delivers such a valuable, time consuming document.
Any comments would be helpful.
Marsar
more...
kirupa
03-11 12:41 AM
Hmm...unless I am missing something very unique/original, I don't think this counts :beam:
hair Support for BlackBerry OS 5.0
Line
07-12 04:59 PM
Thinking about the idea of reusing an old idea.
I decided to reuse an old saying, and in the concept of reuse, I thought of cut and pasting.
Check out my idea of the phrase "Heart On A Sleeve"
http://linedetail.com/siteimages/LinesHeartOnASleeveShirt.jpg
-Line
I decided to reuse an old saying, and in the concept of reuse, I thought of cut and pasting.
Check out my idea of the phrase "Heart On A Sleeve"
http://linedetail.com/siteimages/LinesHeartOnASleeveShirt.jpg
-Line
more...
kiranraheja
10-29 05:48 AM
I recently got my I797 approved (on Oct 19) but, the USCIS denied my extension of stay, and I need to go for stamping in Chennai (as per I797). My question:
1. Can I attend the interview in Canada/Hyderabad consulate instead of Chennai. Company attorney said that should be ok and filing I824 for change of consulate would take long.
In case you wanted to know more details about my case:
-Possess I797 from Employer A until Nov13, 2009.
-Filed for H1b extension with Employer B in Feb, denied in Jun15. payroll with Emp B Feb onwards.
-Re-filed for extn with Emp B in Aug4 finally approved on Oct19 but denied extn of stay.
1. Can I attend the interview in Canada/Hyderabad consulate instead of Chennai. Company attorney said that should be ok and filing I824 for change of consulate would take long.
In case you wanted to know more details about my case:
-Possess I797 from Employer A until Nov13, 2009.
-Filed for H1b extension with Employer B in Feb, denied in Jun15. payroll with Emp B Feb onwards.
-Re-filed for extn with Emp B in Aug4 finally approved on Oct19 but denied extn of stay.
hot Trillian for BlackBerry Beta
mugyaded
11-10 03:22 AM
http://i620.photobucket.com/albums/tt285/mugyaclan/axobutton.png
more...
house twitter for blackberry Twitter
f1vlad
10-29 12:36 PM
Nashua,NH here.
tattoo Angry Birds, for BlackBerry
memyselfandus
04-10 11:13 AM
You cannot apply for I-485 unless I-140 is approved as EB1 is purely based on I-140 not labor.
more...
pictures Phone Plans For Blackberry
roseball
03-21 02:03 AM
Nobody can predict when the quota will fill up. However, note that there are wide spread rumors about the regular quota being used up as early as the first day and Masters within a few weeks. Its in your best interest to file as early as possible.
Here are the time lines for last year:
Regular Quota: May 26th, 2006
Master's Quota: July 26th, 2006
Here are the time lines for last year:
Regular Quota: May 26th, 2006
Master's Quota: July 26th, 2006
dresses for BlackBerry is finally
setpit_gc
12-17 02:05 PM
My current AP expires on July 30, 2008. I am planning to apply for renewal in Jan or Feb 2008, which is 6 months prior to expiration. I understand that nowadays it takes more than 3 months for approval.
In case of emergency, Can I travel to India with my current AP while AP renewal petition is pending?.
Thanks for your help.
In case of emergency, Can I travel to India with my current AP while AP renewal petition is pending?.
Thanks for your help.
more...
makeup Lite for Blackberry,
bigboy007
08-08 01:51 AM
Hello Folks,
I received a code 2 notice for I765 but i dont have my passport as it was sent to renewal. Eventhough FP Notice says ID card should be one of Alien Card / Drivers license , passport, State issued card my experience earlier says ASC only accepts Passport. Will they accept EAD Card etc as ID ? Any experience different than this ? Please post.
Btw this is my third time i am renewing for EAD.
Please advice.
Thanks.
I received a code 2 notice for I765 but i dont have my passport as it was sent to renewal. Eventhough FP Notice says ID card should be one of Alien Card / Drivers license , passport, State issued card my experience earlier says ASC only accepts Passport. Will they accept EAD Card etc as ID ? Any experience different than this ? Please post.
Btw this is my third time i am renewing for EAD.
Please advice.
Thanks.
girlfriend Foursquare for BlackBerry v1.
gman
09-18 05:20 PM
I am on h1-b since Oct 1, 2004. I am EB3-ROW (Rest of World). My company has filed I-140 in June 2006 and it has not been approved yet. How soon would I be able to change jobs? I'm about to finish my master's degree and am hoping to get a job that falls in either eb-2 or eb3 category. How will this impact the ability to keep my i-140. Would i have to start from scratch with my new employer if i find a new job?
Also what is considered my priority date since I havent/cant file an i-485 yet.
Thanks
Also what is considered my priority date since I havent/cant file an i-485 yet.
Thanks
hairstyles for BlackBerry amp; NOKIA
freddyCR
August 12th, 2005, 04:00 AM
1234
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a103/freddyphoto/MISC/IMG_6578Medium.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a103/freddyphoto/MISC/IMG_6578Medium.jpg
haqwin
11-22 04:48 AM
Allthough your solution works I find it more powerful to detect if a PhoneLightThemeVisibility is visible in the resource and add it to App.xaml.cs like this:
public static bool LightThemeEnabled
{
get
{
return (Visibility)Application.Current.Resources["PhoneLightThemeVisibility"] == Visibility.Visible;
}
}
public static bool LightThemeEnabled
{
get
{
return (Visibility)Application.Current.Resources["PhoneLightThemeVisibility"] == Visibility.Visible;
}
}
ravi98
10-25 02:26 PM
Things that make it harder to push for immigration legislation - legal or illegal. New Figures Detail Depth Of Unemployment Misery, Lower Earnings For All But Super Wealthy (VIDEO) (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/25/income_inequality_statistics_tax_code__n_773392.ht ml)
No comments:
Post a Comment