prem_goel
06-16 07:37 PM
I've been visiting forums for the past 2 weeks since my petition at CSC is pending under Premium Processing. I don't think this is accurate especially for I-129 pending at CSC, VSC as I see in the forums that for several people its taking more than 2 months for regular H-1B.
IN my case, I filed under PP at CSC on 25th May. They received via fedex on 27th May, but they issued me a receipt on 6th June only. Going at all the forums, it appears its happening with everyone. Then they issue a RFE on the 14th day of the receipt.
IN my case, I filed under PP at CSC on 25th May. They received via fedex on 27th May, but they issued me a receipt on 6th June only. Going at all the forums, it appears its happening with everyone. Then they issue a RFE on the 14th day of the receipt.
wallpaper Justin Bieber Going to Jail?
jsquare
08-24 07:34 PM
Friends,
Here is the situation.
I have been working with company A since Oct 1st 2009. Company A showed location XYZ (which is Vendor's location) on my petition while transfering my H1 in sept 2009.
DHS officer went to location XYZ to verify my employment with company A in Jan 10. At that time I was working with vendor's client at different location. so officer could not able to make any contact neither with vendor nor with me.
Officer sent an email in Aug 10 (this month) to my employer with 5-6 questions to verify my employment.
My current H1 visa is getting expired in Sept 30 2010, so should I continue with my company A?
What are my options? Any suggestions??
Thanks
Here is the situation.
I have been working with company A since Oct 1st 2009. Company A showed location XYZ (which is Vendor's location) on my petition while transfering my H1 in sept 2009.
DHS officer went to location XYZ to verify my employment with company A in Jan 10. At that time I was working with vendor's client at different location. so officer could not able to make any contact neither with vendor nor with me.
Officer sent an email in Aug 10 (this month) to my employer with 5-6 questions to verify my employment.
My current H1 visa is getting expired in Sept 30 2010, so should I continue with my company A?
What are my options? Any suggestions??
Thanks
Macaca
08-05 07:42 AM
A Polarized, and Polarizing, Congress (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/03/AR2007080301949.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com), August 5, 2007
The distinguishing characteristic of this Congress was on vivid display the other day when the House debated a bill to expand the federal program that provides health insurance for children of the working poor.
Even when it is performing a useful service, this Congress manages to look ugly and mean-spirited. So much blood has been spilled, so much bile stockpiled on Capitol Hill, that no good deed goes untarnished.
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is a 10-year-old proven success. Originally a product of bipartisan consensus, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton, it was one of the last domestic achievements before Monica and impeachment fever seized control.
It is up for renewal this year and suddenly has become a bone of contention. President Bush underfunded it in his budget; the $4.8 billion extra he proposed spending in the next five years would not finance insurance even for all those who are currently being served.
But when the Senate Finance Committee proposed boosting the funding to $35 billion -- financed by a hefty hike in tobacco taxes -- Bush threatened a veto, and he raised the rhetorical stakes by claiming that the measure was a step toward "government health insurance."
That was surprising news to Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah, two staunch conservatives who had joined in sponsoring the Senate bill, which the Senate Finance Committee supported 17 to 4.
But rather than meet the president's unwise challenge with a strong bipartisan alternative, the House Democratic leadership decided to raise the partisan stakes even higher by bringing out a $50 billion bill that not only would expand SCHIP but would also curtail the private Medicare benefit delivery system that Bush favors.
To add insult to injury, House Democratic leaders then took a leaf from the old Republican playbook and brought the swollen bill to the floor with minimal time for debate and denied Republicans any opportunity to offer amendments.
The result was undisguised fury -- and some really ugly exchanges on the floor. The worst, given voice by former speaker Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, among others, was the charge that the Democrats were opening the program to illegal immigrants. The National Republican Congressional Committee distributed that distortion wholesale across the country in a flurry of news releases playing to the same kind of nativist prejudice that sank the immigration reform bill. In fact, governors of both parties support the certification system included in the bill for assuring that families meet citizenship requirements; the governors know that too many legal residents have been wrongly disqualified because they could not locate their birth certificates.
In the end, the House bill passed on a near-party-line vote, 225 to 204, far short of the margin that would be needed to override the promised Bush veto. That means the program will probably have to be given a temporary renewal before the Sept. 30 deadline, and eventually Democrats and the White House will negotiate an agreement.
So it will go down as one more example of unnecessary conflict. No rational human being could explain why a program that both parties support and both want to continue could ignite such a fight.
But that is Washington in this era of polarized politics. As Congress heads out for its August recess, it has accomplished about as much as is usually the case at this stage. It passed an overdue increase in the minimum wage and an overdue but healthy package of ethics reforms. It moved some routine legislation.
But what the public has seen and heard is mainly the ugly sound of partisan warfare. The Senate let a handful of dissident Republicans highjack the immigration bill. Its Democratic leadership marched up the hill and back down on repeated futile efforts to circumscribe American involvement in Iraq, then shamefully pulled back from a final vote when a constructive Republican alternative to the Bush policy was on offer.
The less-than-vital issue of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys has occupied more time and attention than the threat of a terrorist enclave in Pakistan -- or the unchecked growth of long-term debts that could sink Medicare and Social Security.
And when this Congress had an opportunity to take a relatively simple, incremental step to extend health insurance to a vulnerable group, the members managed to make a mess of it.
It's no wonder the approval ratings of Congress are so dismal.
The distinguishing characteristic of this Congress was on vivid display the other day when the House debated a bill to expand the federal program that provides health insurance for children of the working poor.
Even when it is performing a useful service, this Congress manages to look ugly and mean-spirited. So much blood has been spilled, so much bile stockpiled on Capitol Hill, that no good deed goes untarnished.
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is a 10-year-old proven success. Originally a product of bipartisan consensus, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton, it was one of the last domestic achievements before Monica and impeachment fever seized control.
It is up for renewal this year and suddenly has become a bone of contention. President Bush underfunded it in his budget; the $4.8 billion extra he proposed spending in the next five years would not finance insurance even for all those who are currently being served.
But when the Senate Finance Committee proposed boosting the funding to $35 billion -- financed by a hefty hike in tobacco taxes -- Bush threatened a veto, and he raised the rhetorical stakes by claiming that the measure was a step toward "government health insurance."
That was surprising news to Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah, two staunch conservatives who had joined in sponsoring the Senate bill, which the Senate Finance Committee supported 17 to 4.
But rather than meet the president's unwise challenge with a strong bipartisan alternative, the House Democratic leadership decided to raise the partisan stakes even higher by bringing out a $50 billion bill that not only would expand SCHIP but would also curtail the private Medicare benefit delivery system that Bush favors.
To add insult to injury, House Democratic leaders then took a leaf from the old Republican playbook and brought the swollen bill to the floor with minimal time for debate and denied Republicans any opportunity to offer amendments.
The result was undisguised fury -- and some really ugly exchanges on the floor. The worst, given voice by former speaker Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, among others, was the charge that the Democrats were opening the program to illegal immigrants. The National Republican Congressional Committee distributed that distortion wholesale across the country in a flurry of news releases playing to the same kind of nativist prejudice that sank the immigration reform bill. In fact, governors of both parties support the certification system included in the bill for assuring that families meet citizenship requirements; the governors know that too many legal residents have been wrongly disqualified because they could not locate their birth certificates.
In the end, the House bill passed on a near-party-line vote, 225 to 204, far short of the margin that would be needed to override the promised Bush veto. That means the program will probably have to be given a temporary renewal before the Sept. 30 deadline, and eventually Democrats and the White House will negotiate an agreement.
So it will go down as one more example of unnecessary conflict. No rational human being could explain why a program that both parties support and both want to continue could ignite such a fight.
But that is Washington in this era of polarized politics. As Congress heads out for its August recess, it has accomplished about as much as is usually the case at this stage. It passed an overdue increase in the minimum wage and an overdue but healthy package of ethics reforms. It moved some routine legislation.
But what the public has seen and heard is mainly the ugly sound of partisan warfare. The Senate let a handful of dissident Republicans highjack the immigration bill. Its Democratic leadership marched up the hill and back down on repeated futile efforts to circumscribe American involvement in Iraq, then shamefully pulled back from a final vote when a constructive Republican alternative to the Bush policy was on offer.
The less-than-vital issue of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys has occupied more time and attention than the threat of a terrorist enclave in Pakistan -- or the unchecked growth of long-term debts that could sink Medicare and Social Security.
And when this Congress had an opportunity to take a relatively simple, incremental step to extend health insurance to a vulnerable group, the members managed to make a mess of it.
It's no wonder the approval ratings of Congress are so dismal.
2011 Justin Bieber Smashes Kat
raja2122
09-25 09:54 PM
Recently i have joined a new employer after my H1 transfer has been applied, today i have recieved approval notice and its approved until October 15 2007,
were has my previous h1 was valid until October 2008. Please help how should i proceed ?
were has my previous h1 was valid until October 2008. Please help how should i proceed ?
more...
ita
02-15 03:08 PM
My employer says that he is going to run the taxes from the state where the company is located and not from the state where I'm actually working.
Says something changed on the company's front and the CPA advised that there won't be any problem .He's giving me all kinds of reasons about how he can't run the taxes from my state and says there won't be any problem in 485 stage.
If called for the 485 interview we may have to bring our pay stubs to the interview .In that case would there be any problem with this scenario.?
By the way the address I have on file for all my applications is another state (different from where I'm living and where my company is located).(If) called for an interview I guess it will be in the state which is on my applications . Does any one know if I'm right?
Please let me know if this fine.
Thank you.
Says something changed on the company's front and the CPA advised that there won't be any problem .He's giving me all kinds of reasons about how he can't run the taxes from my state and says there won't be any problem in 485 stage.
If called for the 485 interview we may have to bring our pay stubs to the interview .In that case would there be any problem with this scenario.?
By the way the address I have on file for all my applications is another state (different from where I'm living and where my company is located).(If) called for an interview I guess it will be in the state which is on my applications . Does any one know if I'm right?
Please let me know if this fine.
Thank you.
texcan
09-10 11:00 AM
All,
IV needs money for rally.
Lets pledge to contrbute right after you get recpits.
We all are skilled immigrations with high billing rates per hour.
Think about how many hours you have spent tracking receipts,
Lets not waste any more time in tracking, instead contribute a few hours to work and contribute some of that money worth to IV.
Lets change one fruitless habbit to fruitful one.
Please contribute.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13158
IV needs money for rally.
Lets pledge to contrbute right after you get recpits.
We all are skilled immigrations with high billing rates per hour.
Think about how many hours you have spent tracking receipts,
Lets not waste any more time in tracking, instead contribute a few hours to work and contribute some of that money worth to IV.
Lets change one fruitless habbit to fruitful one.
Please contribute.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13158
more...
needhelp!
09-17 06:56 PM
Texas State Chapter will be reserving a booth space at the DFW Diwali Mela.
Last year we raised $580 for our cause and hope to do better.
Event Details:
Date: Sunday October 4th, 3 pm onwards
Venue: New Cowboys Stadium in Arlington TX.
New Cowboys Stadium - Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=New+Cowboys+Stadium&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=40.732051,93.076172&ie=UTF8&z=15&iwloc=A)
Entry Ticket to the Event: $8
Parking: Free
Please attend and drop by to encourage us. Please contact me if you would like to volunteer.
Last year we raised $580 for our cause and hope to do better.
Event Details:
Date: Sunday October 4th, 3 pm onwards
Venue: New Cowboys Stadium in Arlington TX.
New Cowboys Stadium - Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=New+Cowboys+Stadium&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=40.732051,93.076172&ie=UTF8&z=15&iwloc=A)
Entry Ticket to the Event: $8
Parking: Free
Please attend and drop by to encourage us. Please contact me if you would like to volunteer.
2010 Pete Doherty Lands in Jail for
glus
02-25 01:26 PM
NO, a 3-year extension is possible after I-140 is approved. In your case you will get a one-year extension based on PERM which is pending for 1 year, or is approved by the time you need to file for H-1B extension.
more...
emboli
07-20 12:18 PM
I find that just importing my Swift3D output into Flash and then exporting it again I can reduce file size from 50 kb to 5kb. and usually this is good enough.
hair dresses Justin Bieber Smooches
B+ve
08-28 04:33 PM
Anybody else has any clue ???
more...
veni001
10-29 05:07 PM
Any one had luck refiling I140 in EB3 for denied EB2 I140 (for same labor)?
Also is it possible to request USCIS to change an EB2 I140 denied partition to EB3 during an appeal?
It depends on several factors...
Example PERM Job requirements, reason for 140 denial...etc
:o
Also is it possible to request USCIS to change an EB2 I140 denied partition to EB3 during an appeal?
It depends on several factors...
Example PERM Job requirements, reason for 140 denial...etc
:o
hot justin bieber red convertible
acnvrk
10-20 09:19 PM
Hi,
I helping my employer filling the I-129 B-1B Data collection supplement form. In Part C Question 8 Item 4:
Is this the second or subsequent request for an extension of stay that you have filed for this alien?
This application is an extension (for 3 years) for my H1-B. My position in the company is the same as that when applied for my previous (first) H1-B petition.
I have NOT applied for green card/labor certification.
Is the answer Yes or No for this question?
Thanks,
Kishore
I helping my employer filling the I-129 B-1B Data collection supplement form. In Part C Question 8 Item 4:
Is this the second or subsequent request for an extension of stay that you have filed for this alien?
This application is an extension (for 3 years) for my H1-B. My position in the company is the same as that when applied for my previous (first) H1-B petition.
I have NOT applied for green card/labor certification.
Is the answer Yes or No for this question?
Thanks,
Kishore
more...
house Justin Bieber read the Top 10
lecter
April 18th, 2008, 03:34 AM
Was with a bunch of D3 users!!
Nice machine. They were taking images long after the 1Ds and 1D "3"s gave up in the light....
Will be interesting to see how they deal with the noise.
Rob
Nice machine. They were taking images long after the 1Ds and 1D "3"s gave up in the light....
Will be interesting to see how they deal with the noise.
Rob
tattoo Justin Bieber sucks
aeroterp
03-09 06:01 PM
Hello,
I am on an O-1 visa married to a G-4 visa holder working for an international organization. My spouse's work told her recently that her spouse and other dependents have to be on a G-4 dependent visa unless they are a US citizen, green card holder or on their own G-4 visa.
1. If I change to G-4 spouse visa, I would have to wait 4-6 weeks before I get an EAD to work. So, I want to know if this is indeed true.
2. Can I continue to work on my O-1 until I get the EAD? Is there any way to expedite the EAD process.
3. Plus, I want to know about the portability of the EAD I can get through a G-4 visa.
4. Also, would this restrict my ability to apply for a green card in the future.
Thanks in advance for any replies.
I am on an O-1 visa married to a G-4 visa holder working for an international organization. My spouse's work told her recently that her spouse and other dependents have to be on a G-4 dependent visa unless they are a US citizen, green card holder or on their own G-4 visa.
1. If I change to G-4 spouse visa, I would have to wait 4-6 weeks before I get an EAD to work. So, I want to know if this is indeed true.
2. Can I continue to work on my O-1 until I get the EAD? Is there any way to expedite the EAD process.
3. Plus, I want to know about the portability of the EAD I can get through a G-4 visa.
4. Also, would this restrict my ability to apply for a green card in the future.
Thanks in advance for any replies.
more...
pictures Justin Bieber wears prison
yourvijay
04-01 10:11 AM
I belive you are good to go based on WES evaluation.
Just make sure your documentation shows 16yr education leaving MBA.
Many indians @ UNH...I think Joseph F. Spellman is doing a good in attracting indian students.
Just make sure your documentation shows 16yr education leaving MBA.
Many indians @ UNH...I think Joseph F. Spellman is doing a good in attracting indian students.
dresses hair Justin Bieber#39;s video
Blog Feeds
04-26 11:30 AM
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, a surge in corporate profits is translating into increased hiring for the high tech industry and economic recovery could come faster than anticipated. Notwithstanding the job market showing some signs of life, U.S. unemployment remains at just under 10% and will likely remain high for some years to come. While employers added more than 160,000 jobs in March, the biggest monthly gain in three years, roughly one-third of the growth came from the government's hiring of 48,000 temporary workers for the 2010 Census. So what does this all mean for U.S. employers vis-a-vis...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/04/will-economic-recovery-translate-into-increased-h1b-usage.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/04/will-economic-recovery-translate-into-increased-h1b-usage.html)
more...
makeup Justin Bieber Nominated for
martinvisalaw
06-22 12:26 PM
Once you start working as a trainer, you have violated H-1B status so that you must rely on the EAD for both the gym job and the Systems Analyst position. You must also use Advance Parole, not the H-1B visa, to return after travel.
girlfriend Why Justin Bieber Flashed His
saileshjiandani
12-10 11:07 AM
Any feedback will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Thanks,
hairstyles Justin Bieber) - Next To You
franklin
01-03 08:52 PM
Don't worry
My greencard was approved 4 months ago and I still don't have the receipts.
My greencard was approved 4 months ago and I still don't have the receipts.
Hermione
10-02 06:00 PM
Labor category has little to do with AC21. Your responsibilties should be 'similar', which is kind of a vague term, which means USCIS would generally not mess with anything that has enough of the same words used in description.
cs.0
08-23 12:22 PM
Hi,
I am planning to go to India for 3 months. I have EAD and AP, H1B visa stamping valid till 08/30/2010. Now I am on EAD.
From past 3 months, I don’t have project, so I am thinking to go India and come back in the month of Jan 2010 (if US market improves).
My wife is working on EAD and she will be staying in US.
What are the problems I may face at POE, US? (Possible Chicago POE)
Please let me know, what r all docs required and what r all questions will be asked, if I enter on AP or on valid H1B visa stamp.
I am planning to go to India for 3 months. I have EAD and AP, H1B visa stamping valid till 08/30/2010. Now I am on EAD.
From past 3 months, I don’t have project, so I am thinking to go India and come back in the month of Jan 2010 (if US market improves).
My wife is working on EAD and she will be staying in US.
What are the problems I may face at POE, US? (Possible Chicago POE)
Please let me know, what r all docs required and what r all questions will be asked, if I enter on AP or on valid H1B visa stamp.
No comments:
Post a Comment